Simply_Nikki
Puritan Board Junior
Heidi I see your point. My view of dating is that it shouldn't be entered into whimsically with out any intention or purpose nor to simply "have fun" with a person of the opposite sex. At the same time I do not believe it should be so serious and intense that it seems like the two have already exchanged wedding vowels when they say yes to going out. I do like the idea of group interaction which takes the pressure off the two individuals who may be interested in each other and holds both accountable in guarding their hearts.
Perhaps I am reading too much into the initiation. Perhaps it shouldn't be taken as seriously as I've been implying it to be.
To clarify when I said exclusive before, all i meant was, the two have made some sort of agreement to not consider other possible dating options for a length of time until they have decided they are not compatible. In other words, they've agreed they're not going to be players or serial daters. I suppose this option would come after both have clearly expressed genuine interest in the other.
BTW.. why do you all get the impression that there is a guy I'm particularly interested in? What if I was completely theoretical?
Perhaps I am reading too much into the initiation. Perhaps it shouldn't be taken as seriously as I've been implying it to be.
To clarify when I said exclusive before, all i meant was, the two have made some sort of agreement to not consider other possible dating options for a length of time until they have decided they are not compatible. In other words, they've agreed they're not going to be players or serial daters. I suppose this option would come after both have clearly expressed genuine interest in the other.
BTW.. why do you all get the impression that there is a guy I'm particularly interested in? What if I was completely theoretical?