Status
Not open for further replies.
No, but as Hs really not pleased either with Gay marriages and Abortion, as He permits those sinful activities to continue in this present age .
I am discussing this from not the position of God likes what will get done, but from the position what does He permit and allow for under our form of government, and religious liberties would extend to all or to none.
So, God is not pleased with governments countenancing Satanism, but they ought to do it anyway?
 
So, God is not pleased with governments countenancing Satanism, but they ought to do it anyway?
No, I am just saying that God allows for us here in America, due to being a republic, to choose to do things and act in ways that are sinful and things that God hates, but still permits to be done for now.
 
No, I am just saying that God allows for us here in America, due to being a republic, to choose to do things and act in ways that are sinful and things that God hates, but still permits to be done for now.

Has it occurred to you that the Lord can permit evil to continue on this earth because he is God and has all sovereignty and wisdom, but a man is not at all like God in these ways? For a mere man to say, "Though I could confront it, this evil shall continue because it fits in with God's overall purpose," is towering arrogance.

The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law. Deuteronomy 29:29
 
Last edited:
The Law of god should be obeyed by all persons, buty only Christians actually are under the mandate from God to do that...

This is rather obviously inconsistent.

There is no direct mandate from God in the scriptures to have the government enforce that, but there is a mandate on each individual to obey the Lord.

We're going around in circles here.

You have yet to establish that those in government are exempted from obedience to the moral law.
 
No, I am just saying that God allows for us here in America, due to being a republic, to choose to do things and act in ways that are sinful and things that God hates, but still permits to be done for now.

You keep saying that, but you have not given any support for it.
 
Yes, [sacrificing kittens is okie-dokie] if that was part of their religious beliefs.

So killing kittens to please idols is fine. But what are the limits? How about polygamy? Child slavery? By what standard do you determine what is and isn't acceptable among the unbelievers who are permitted to dwell alongside us? Not the Bible, surely! Then the whim of a ruler?

It all seems more than a bit arbitrary.
 
Psalm 2:10-12

Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.

Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling.

Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
 
No, I am just saying that God allows for us here in America, due to being a republic, to choose to do things and act in ways that are sinful and things that God hates, but still permits to be done for now.
So, should the government protect and defend Satanism or not?
 
God allows for us here in America, due to being a republic, to choose to do things and act in ways that are sinful
So, God respects our form of government, as an allowable exception to the mandate to worship and serve Him rightly and alone?
Prior to independence, then, were the American colonies obliged to submit to God, only to be 'liberated' from that obligation on July 4th, 1776?
 
Is it a sin for the civil magistrate to forbid a Satanist from sacrificing a cat on a pentagram and chanting, "So mote it be"?
 
This is rather obviously inconsistent.



We're going around in circles here.

You have yet to establish that those in government are exempted from obedience to the moral law.
What scriptures would you point to to support that God requires a government to uphold His law/Moral Code if not under a theonomy though?
 
So killing kittens to please idols is fine. But what are the limits? How about polygamy? Child slavery? By what standard do you determine what is and isn't acceptable among the unbelievers who are permitted to dwell alongside us? Not the Bible, surely! Then the whim of a ruler?

It all seems more than a bit arbitrary.
In our type of Government, a Republic, the final law of this land is not the scriptures, but the US Constitution. Should it be the Bible? yes, but that is not the current situation.
 
What scriptures would you point to to support that God requires a government to uphold His law/Moral Code if not under a theonomy though?

David,
What "law", if not God's Law, will all men be judged by on the day of judgment?
 
Psalm 2:10-12

Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.

Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling.

Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.
The passage refers to the time when all of the earth is under the direct reign of the Lord Jesus though.
 
Bingo. What if, ala Joseph Smith, my religion teaches I can have many womens? As to child slavery, to use the old libertarian mantra, "But what if the child consents?"
those are both illegal acts, as per our Constitution and Supreme Court decisions. The point is that here in the US, the final arbitrator for all things done would be the Constitution, as applied and understood by the Supreme Court.
 
David,
What "law", if not God's Law, will all men be judged by on the day of judgment?
They will be judged by the Lord Jesus Himself, and again, the Law of God is not at this current time the basis for legality here in America. that is our Constitution.
 
They will be judged by the Lord Jesus Himself, and again, the Law of God is not at this current time the basis for legality here in America. that is our Constitution.

That is not a proper answer to the question asked: I believe it was something like "What should the State do about heresy"? With that being the question, a good answer would be that the State should do what is right in the eyes of God. Insofar as they continue to do evil, it seems to me, is the degree of wrath each of those men/women are heaping up for themselves on the day of wrath.....
 
That is not a proper answer to the question asked: I believe it was something like "What should the State do about heresy"? With that being the question, a good answer would be that the State should do what is right in the eyes of God. Insofar as they continue to do evil, it seems to me, is the degree of wrath each of those men/women are heaping up for themselves on the day of wrath.....
The Government should of course do what the Lord had revealed and shown to us is the right things to do, to uphold His ways, but God has not set America up as a Theonomy.
 
The Government should of course do what the Lord had revealed and shown to us is the right things to do, to uphold His ways, but God has not set America up as a Theonomy.

Thenomy is not required for people to do what is right. Trucking out Theonomy doesn't really deal with the ought that is required by all men....
 
those are both illegal acts, as per our Constitution and Supreme Court decisions. The point is that here in the US, the final arbitrator for all things done would be the Constitution, as applied and understood by the Supreme Court.

Let's say that the Constitution is amended to allow for polygamy, now what?
 
The Government should of course do what the Lord had revealed and shown to us is the right things to do, to uphold His ways, but God has not set America up as a Theonomy.

No one on this thread has advocated theonomy.

Do you understand the difference between "is" and "ought"?
 
Bingo! That is the right answer to the OP. The question wasn't what they do, nor what they believe the Constitution allows them to do, but what should they do.
I agree with that sentiment, but my point has always been that under our type of Government, the IS Constitution, and not the Bible, is the rule of the land.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top