Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
John Stott was anglican.
Many protestant denominations will not call a pastor who is not married, at least not as a senior or teaching pastor. The reasoning behind this is that an unmarried pastor will become distracted by all the single females who will undoubtably be seeking his affections. I can understand their point, but considering Paul's exhortation that those who can remain single should remain single, I think that this policy is impossible to defend biblically.
Many protestant denominations will not call a pastor who is not married, at least not as a senior or teaching pastor. The reasoning behind this is that an unmarried pastor will become distracted by all the single females who will undoubtably be seeking his affections. I can understand their point, but considering Paul's exhortation that those who can remain single should remain single, I think that this policy is impossible to defend biblically.
I think a reasonable argument could be made from the requirement that an overseer be the husband of one wife. The experience that comes from leading one's household could be invaluable in leading a church.
The reasoning behind this is that an unmarried pastor will become distracted by all the single females who will undoubtably be seeking his affections.
Many protestant denominations will not call a pastor who is not married, at least not as a senior or teaching pastor. The reasoning behind this is that an unmarried pastor will become distracted by all the single females who will undoubtably be seeking his affections. I can understand their point, but considering Paul's exhortation that those who can remain single should remain single, I think that this policy is impossible to defend biblically.[/QUOTE
I think a reasonable argument could be made from the requirement that an overseer be the husband of one wife. The experience that comes from leading one's household could be invaluable in leading a church.
I agree that experience running a household is important and a good test of the ability of an elder, but I think that Paul's requirement regarding being the husband of one wife has more to do with polygamy than with whether one is single or not. I think that there are a lot of great reasons to prefer a married pastor, but I don't think there is a good biblical case for completely excluding a single man who is otherwise qualified.
---------- Post added at 08:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:58 PM ----------
The reasoning behind this is that an unmarried pastor will become distracted by all the single females who will undoubtably be seeking his affections.
No one cares about that It's expected that a single man become distracted by single women. The reason experienced people normally are hesitant to call single pastors is that one of a pastor's most common duties is marriage counseling, and a lonely woman in a bad marriage and a lonely pastor in that situation usually mix like fire and gun powder. The usual goal is an experienced man with a wife who can supporting him during counseling. It's a rare breed, though, and so exceptions are made.
That is a good point, and in fact we could probably come up with hundreds of reasons why a single pastor could run into trouble. Despite this, I still think that we cannot make a solid biblical case for completely excluding all single men from the pastorate. Otherwise we become a church that would deny the Apostle Paul a pastorate were he alive today.
On the other hand, being single may enable one be more devoted to his ministry.
Despite this, I still think that we cannot make a solid biblical case for completely excluding all single men from the pastorate.
1Co 7:7-9 I wish that all were as I myself am. But each has his own gift from God, one of one kind and one of another. (8) To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is good for them to remain single as I am. (9) But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion.
Despite this, I still think that we cannot make a solid biblical case for completely excluding all single men from the pastorate.
Personally, I don't think we can make any case at all, given that Paul was single.
Not as a matter of biblical command, but as practical necessity- the ability of the Pastor, Minister, Bishop to minister to those who are married, the norm standard, by the institution God created for the perpetuation of the human race. To set that ordinary exemplary standard before the life of the covenant community.
The reason experienced people normally are hesitant to call single pastors is that one of a pastor's most common duties is marriage counseling, and a lonely woman in a bad marriage and a lonely pastor in that situation usually mix like fire and gun powder. The usual goal is an experienced man with a wife who can supporting him during counseling. It's a rare breed, though, and so exceptions are made.
Just curious (I hope this doesn't sound critical; it's not intended as such!) -- how would you differentiate the ministry of the word from marriage & family counseling? One is public teaching/proclamation/application; the other, private.
having ruling elders would allow an unmarried teaching elder to focus on ministry of the word and allow the older, more experienced ruling elders to do marriage and family counseling.
having ruling elders would allow an unmarried teaching elder to focus on ministry of the word and allow the older, more experienced ruling elders to do marriage and family counseling.
I like that idea! In fact, let's just have the REs do ALL the counseling all the time - in fact we could have them take over all that "people business" that interfers with studying the Word -and let's dig a tunnel from the pastor's study to the pulpit so that the pastor can sit in his study all week and then just "appear" in the pulpit to deliver the sermon and then, when finished, he could "disappear" and go back to his study for another week.
having ruling elders would allow an unmarried teaching elder to focus on ministry of the word and allow the older, more experienced ruling elders to do marriage and family counseling.
I like that idea! In fact, let's just have the REs do ALL the counseling all the time - in fact we could have them take over all that "people business" that interfers with studying the Word -and let's dig a tunnel from the pastor's study to the pulpit so that the pastor can sit in his study all week and then just "appear" in the pulpit to deliver the sermon and then, when finished, he could "disappear" and go back to his study for another week.
A pastor counseling a woman alone is like mixing fire and gun powder whether the pastor is unmarried or married.
A pastor counseling a woman alone is like mixing fire and gun powder whether the pastor is unmarried or married.
Agreed. No man should be left alone with a woman that isn't his wife, sister, cousin, or grandma.