Should my X-Mormon wife be re-baptized?

Should she be baptized again?

  • Should not be baptized again

    Votes: 2 6.3%
  • Should be baptized again because of those who adminsitered the bap

    Votes: 4 12.5%
  • Should be baptized again because of the beliefs of those who adminstered

    Votes: 6 18.8%
  • Combo of 3 and 4

    Votes: 20 62.5%

  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Update; we met with our pastor and he said, even if she had sound beliefs as was baptized, they still require age be baptized for the reason that, not so much because the person who administered it was a heretic, but since the church she was baptized at was no real church and that our church is responsible to make sure she is baptized in the true church.

In other words, part of the reason of baptism is not just the person being baptized beliefs, but also because of the church that administers it must be the real church so that that church body can aknowledge it
 
From the 1845 General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church:

In view of the fact that several churches hold grave errors in connection with much saving truth, and that perhaps no church receives in everything the exact mind of the Spirit, it may be asked with what degree of strictness or liberality this mark of a true visible Church is to be applied. It seems to us consonant with the Scriptures and the judgment of charity to answer, that so long as any communion so retains the essential truths of God's Word and the aids of the Holy Ghost as to save souls by its ministrations, it shall be held a true, though imperfect, member of His visible body. Though it may omit or impugn some principles which we have received from God, and may even deny to our ordinances all recognition, and to our communion all church character, yet we may not imitate its uncharitableness; so long as Christ visibly entrusts it with His saving Word and Spirit, we are bound to recognize it as His visible body, notwithstanding its errors, and to pray for its attainment of a more peaceable unity in the bonds of the truth. But in judging the tendency of its ordinances to save souls, it is obviously proper that we shall estimate those ministrations as a consistent whole, as set forth by this communication. If their only tendency as a whole, taken as it expounds them to its members, is destructive to souls, then we cannot admit that it is a pillar and ground of saving truth, merely because of some disjointed fragments of the gospel verities, mixed with heresies which, if heartily accepted by the people as taught, must be fatal to souls; or because a few persons, through the special teaching of God's Spirit, leading them to select the spiritual meat and reject the poison, actually find Christ under those ministrations; for the proper function of a visible Church is instrumentally to communicate to its disciples spiritual discernment, and not to presuppose it; and the happy escape of these souls from damnable error is due to the special grace of God shielding them against the regular effect of these ministrations, rather than employing and blessing them. If this rule of judgment be denied, then might a valid church character possibly be established for an association of infidels investigating parts of God's Word only for purposes of cavil, since the Almighty Spirit might, against these purposes, employ those parts of the Word to awaken and convert some member.

The LDS are not a true church, they are bound up in heresy, and they are destructive of souls. There baptism is totally invalid and a nullity.

Indeed, because of their practice of proxy baptism, it may well be that many of us were baptized into the Mormon church. That is no reason for us to forego a Christian baptism.

Many Catholics are bound up in heresy and false teaching yet there are some saved Catholics, and in the same way, could there not be some young Mormons (who all they know is "Jesus saves me from my sins" and are not yet introduced to the damnable heresies) are saved?

Leaving aside everything else and all the bad teachings of Rome, Rome at least confesses Trinitarianism and that God the Father doesn't have a male reproductive organ. (I'm not arguing whether their baptisms are legit or not, but simply that they at least meet the barest minimum of Christian confession. Mormonism does not)
 
She should be re baptized as she was not holding to the Christian truths if a Mormon, and that "church" is not a valid church of Jesus, it is a cult!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top