Looking for input on providing additional references for this 'dialogue' about partaking of the Lord's Supper: Part 1

NaphtaliPress

Administrator
Staff member
I'm looking for input from PB folk on additional 'proofs' or direct or indirect allusions to Scripture or the Westminster Standards in the text below which comes from A Familiar Conference between a minister and a doubting Christian, concerning the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper. It's sparse on any referencing. It is by Daniel Campbell. I've flagged some places but you may see others that I'm not. I've found 3 Scripture references in this first section to add without over reaching. I'm not posting it all at once but will do so in bits if this first posting garners any interest and useful feedback.

Part One.
Christian. Sir, If it may be no interruption to your studies, I would be glad to be resolved of several doubts that arise in my mind, about receiving the blessed sacrament of the Lord's Supper.

Minister. I shall be very glad to contribute anything for removing those scruples which may disturb you upon that account.

Christian. Sir, I have heard many sermons and read several discourses, which do much urge and declare the necessity of communicating in this blessed ordinance, and yet I durst never presume to join therein.

Minister. Have you then hitherto lived in the neglect of this important duty? [possible reference for where is this implicitly or explicitly said to be a duty?]

Christian. To speak freely, Sir, I never yet did communicate therein all my life, because I have much questioned whether I were worthy to receive that blessed and holy seal, to the glory of God, and my own edification and comfort, since I truly never understood the institution, nature, administration, and ends of it, nor the qualifications of those who are to be partakers thereof, according to the appointment of Jesus Christ.

Minister. Well then, I hope if these things be plainly opened to you, it may much conduce to satisfy your scruples.

Christian. Sir, I shall receive your instructions with thankfulness, and, if my heart deceive me not, shall rejoice in the light and knowledge I may gain thereby.

Minister. Let us then first inquire into the qualifications of a sincere Christian in general, and secondly, of the qualifications of such Christians as are meet to partake of the Lord's Supper; for they are distinct, and sometimes separate.

Christian. I hope in doing this, you will much help me to judge of my present state and condition God-ward. And now, in the first place, pray inform me, how I may know if I am a sincere Christian.

Minister. All true believers, among other graces, have such a knowledge of God in Christ, as works by love,[1] and stirs up in them an earnest study of the will of God, and a sincere endeavor to live in the faith, knowledge and practice of it.

Christian. Sir, I cannot boast of knowledge, yet by the grace of God showed to me, those conceptions which I have of God in Christ, have, I hope, so far prevailed upon me, that to live in the knowledge, love, and enjoyment of him, and to have my all devoted to his will and praise, is all the heaven I desire in this world, a great part of that which I hope for in the world to come.

Minister. These are good signs of a real and renewed change in your soul, and so doubtless have wrought good dispositions in you, of which you have had evidence in your heart and have made it appear in your life and actions.

Christian. I would be loath to flatter myself, but yet I hope that I find some delight in the Word of God, both read and preached, and do seriously meditate thereon, that I may grow in grace and in the knowledge of Jesus Christ our Lord.[2] And though I am sometimes tempted with vile vain thoughts, yet I endeavor to stifle them, and my heart rises against them. I thank God, I strive to resist the first motions to sin, and avoid all occasions of evil, and I am never more uneasy, than when I happen into the company of profane and ill people, having a hatred to lying, obscene and filthy discourses, swearing, cursing and all dishonorable reflections upon God and godliness. I make conscience of taking up a slander against my neighbor, and to be just, and to do good to all, according to my ability, and to walk in all the commandments of the Lord blameless.[3]

--------------

[1] Galatians 5:6
[2] 2 Peter 3:18
[3] Luke 1:6
 
Minister. Have you then hitherto lived in the neglect of this important duty? [possible reference for where is this implicitly or explicitly said to be a duty?]

This is operating a bit out of my usual lane... and I'm not sure just how "implicit" you're wanting to be

1 Cor. 23, 24:
For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, “This is my body, which is for you; do this [τοῦτο ποιεῖτε - imperative mood] in remembrance of me.” In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this [τοῦτο ποιεῖτε], whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me.”

This may be a reach, but it's the best I can come up with in the WS...

WLC
Q. 91. What is the duty which God requireth of man?
A. The duty which God requireth of man, is obedience to his revealed will.

Q. 162. What is a sacrament?
A. A sacrament is an holy ordinance instituted by Christ in his church, to signify, seal, and exhibit unto those that are within the covenant of grace, the benefits of his mediation; to strengthen and increase their faith, and all other graces; to oblige them to obedience; to testify and cherish their love and communion one with another; and to distinguish them from those that are without.


There are conceivably numerous general correlations in the WLC, as for example:

Christian. I would be loath to flatter myself, but yet I hope that I find some delight in the Word of God, both read and preached, and do seriously meditate thereon, that I may grow in grace and in the knowledge of Jesus Christ our Lord

Q. 160. What is required of those that hear the word preached?
A. It is required of those that hear the word preached, that they attend upon it with diligence, preparation, and prayer; examine what they hear by the Scriptures; receive the truth with faith, love, meekness, and readiness of mind, as the Word of God; meditate, and confer of it; hide it in their hearts, and bring forth the fruit of it in their lives.

There are also numerous general (some antithetical) scripture correlations - maybe not quite the thing your looking for? - in other words the discourse is obviously very "biblical" - so where to stop?

Christian. I would be loath to flatter myself, but yet I hope that I find some delight in the Word of God, both read and preached, and do seriously meditate thereon, that I may grow in grace and in the knowledge of Jesus Christ our Lord.[2] And though I am sometimes tempted with vile vain thoughts, yet I endeavor to stifle them, and my heart rises against them. I thank God, I strive to resist the first motions to sin [James 1:15], and avoid all occasions of evil [1 Pet. 3:11], and I am never more uneasy, than when I happen into the company of profane and ill people [1 Cor. 15:33], having a hatred to lying, obscene and filthy discourses, swearing, cursing [Eph. 4:29, 5:4, Colossians 3:8] and all dishonorable reflections upon God and godliness. I make conscience of taking up a slander against my neighbor, and to be just, and to do good to all, according to my ability, and to walk in all the commandments of the Lord blameless.[3]

Also, do you know why this treatise also appears in John Flavel's Works?
 
Also, do you know why this treatise also appears in John Flavel's Works?
I do not! My author , Daniel Campbell, died in 1722. Need to see if it appears in Flavel's works before those later ones. If it does, then he or the printer borrowed it from Flavel and inserted it in an edition of his sacramental catechism. My guess without digging is that is the case; there would be presumably no reason to borrow from Campbell to put in Flavel's works. If it is Flavel's then this project is pretty much done.
 
The work seems to be universally attributed to Flavel. One biographer noted he was in process of putting together an expanded book of meditations when he died - of which this treatise was apparently going to be a part? That would explain why it only appears in posthumous compilations of his works.
 
This may be the issue. Campbell's piece published in 1703 with his devout and frequent communicant, is "A Dialogue between a private Christian and a Minister of the Gospel concerning preparation for the Lord's Supper". In the 1769 edition of Campbell's sacramental meditations the publisher appends "A Familiar Conference between a minister and a doubting Christian, concerning the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper" without any notice of author. I need to get photographs of the actual Campbell work and see what the text is like (very rare; not online; need to get someone to go out to Princeton). I didn't notice the change in title. With the Flavel only appearing in his works, it is hard to figure how this was a similar mistake. Need to get the actual work and see what's what.
 
"He [Flavel] purposed to have enlarged his book of "Sacramental Meditations," and had most judiciously stated and handled several cases of conscience on that occasion, which he designed to have inserted in the next edition, but lived not to finish them for the press." Here.
 
Meaning it was attributed to Flavel during Campbell's lifetime. Seems fairly conclusive...
 
Meaning it was attributed to Flavel during Campbell's lifetime. Seems fairly conclusive...
Correct. It is important now to verify that they are two distinct pieces given the inclusion of the Flavel in later editions of Campbell. The devout and frequent communicant was only one edition in 1703 as opposed to numerous editions of his meditations, and very rare, and I only locate a couple of copies, at Princeton and in Edinburgh. Nothing online. So a trip to one of those places by a local to obtain a look if not photos is the thing I need to line up.
 
This may be the issue. Campbell's piece published in 1703 with his devout and frequent communicant, is "A Dialogue between a private Christian and a Minister of the Gospel concerning preparation for the Lord's Supper". In the 1769 edition of Campbell's sacramental meditations the publisher appends "A Familiar Conference between a minister and a doubting Christian, concerning the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper" without any notice of author. I need to get photographs of the actual Campbell work and see what the text is like (very rare; not online; need to get someone to go out to Princeton). I didn't notice the change in title. With the Flavel only appearing in his works, it is hard to figure how this was a similar mistake. Need to get the actual work and see what's what.
If you contact Princeton, they may more than likely be perfectly obliging to scan if for you and put it in the Public Domain afterwards. When I was first using DeepL, I was trying to get all 5-6 volumes of Vos' Dogmatics in Dutch to auto-translate and put in the PD. Contacted Princeton Library as I saw they had one of the only remaining copies, and they, without charge, scanned them for me, then uploaded to Archive.
 
If you contact Princeton, they may more than likely be perfectly obliging to scan if for you and put it in the Public Domain afterwards. When I was first using DeepL, I was trying to get all 5-6 volumes of Vos' Dogmatics in Dutch to auto-translate and put in the PD. Contacted Princeton Library as I saw they had one of the only remaining copies, and they, without charge, scanned them for me, then uploaded to Archive.

Nice! Good to see such an iconic educational institution being so responsive to public requests. With 20,000,000 or so items in their library, that's certainly the best way to prioritize within a digitization program, so as to be most useful to real-world needs.
 
Nice! Good to see such an iconic educational institution being so responsive to public requests. With 20,000,000 or so items in their library, that's certainly the best way to prioritize within a digitization program, so as to be most useful to real-world needs.
I know, it shocked me too. That such a prestigious place like Princeton, would care or even respond to a request by a nobody living in podunk TX. But they did, and were extremely nice and attentive. The same with Harvard when I was requesting scans of Hill/Zanchi's "Life Everlasting." Tried UCLA for Gearings "Key to Heaven," but they kind of gave me the runaround, which I cant really blame them, as they were in the process of switching their scanning from in house, to outsourcing it to USC. But I have found these institutions have awesome librarians, and many of them are responsive, kind, and courteous.
 
If you contact Princeton, they may more than likely be perfectly obliging to scan if for you and put it in the Public Domain afterwards. When I was first using DeepL, I was trying to get all 5-6 volumes of Vos' Dogmatics in Dutch to auto-translate and put in the PD. Contacted Princeton Library as I saw they had one of the only remaining copies, and they, without charge, scanned them for me, then uploaded to Archive.
This is worth pursuing and I had thought about it. If you have still the direct contact that was successful, could you send it to me via PB conversation? Thanks.
 
Back
Top