Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Preach on the glory and majesty of God and His Son. Avoid theological terminology. Stick to Scriptural phrases and concepts. Lord willing they will be edified and won't have any reason to be offended.
Preach on the glory and majesty of God and His Son. Avoid theological terminology. Stick to Scriptural phrases and concepts. Lord willing they will be edified and won't have any reason to be offended.
Why avoid theological terminology?
Preach on the glory and majesty of God and His Son. Avoid theological terminology. Stick to Scriptural phrases and concepts. Lord willing they will be edified and won't have any reason to be offended.
Why avoid theological terminology?
Seeking to do good to souls, glorify God, and provide no cause for stumbling. As I understand it this seems like a one-time opportunity. Assuming that the congregation is theologically untaught or misinformed I would not introduce theological terms that will not be comprehended or needlessly provoke the flock and have their minds tuning out the good Word of God.
I have preached in many non-reformed churches. I preached on suffering and the sovereignty of God, the authority of Scripture and finding Christ in the Old Testament.
No wait! Ephesians 1 or 2
No wait! Ephesians 1 or 2
Two CHAPTERS! That would take a while to unpack!
Why avoid theological terminology?
Seeking to do good to souls, glorify God, and provide no cause for stumbling. As I understand it this seems like a one-time opportunity. Assuming that the congregation is theologically untaught or misinformed I would not introduce theological terms that will not be comprehended or needlessly provoke the flock and have their minds tuning out the good Word of God.
O. okay. Wont the theolgical terms (as long as there is a explanation of these terms) be a good thing? To me, it just seems, that using these terms or encouraging believers to read theology is a great thing. We need a knowledge of God, and avoiding theology is one of the reasons our churches dont know God...
If you were invited to guest preach at a non-Reformed church, what would you preach? How would you decide? And yes, I am asking because I have been asked to preach at a non-Reformed church, and no, I am not looking to cause trouble.
Seeking to do good to souls, glorify God, and provide no cause for stumbling. As I understand it this seems like a one-time opportunity. Assuming that the congregation is theologically untaught or misinformed I would not introduce theological terms that will not be comprehended or needlessly provoke the flock and have their minds tuning out the good Word of God.
O. okay. Wont the theolgical terms (as long as there is a explanation of these terms) be a good thing? To me, it just seems, that using these terms or encouraging believers to read theology is a great thing. We need a knowledge of God, and avoiding theology is one of the reasons our churches dont know God...
Joshua askedIf you were invited to guest preach at a non-Reformed church, what would you preach? How would you decide? And yes, I am asking because I have been asked to preach at a non-Reformed church, and no, I am not looking to cause trouble.
In a single sermon it is not to be expected that unfamiliar terms will be made clear to a congregation unfamiliar with strong meat.
2 Timothy 2:24 And a servant of the Lord must not quarrel but be gentle to all, able to teach, patient,
Seeking to do good to souls, glorify God, and provide no cause for stumbling. As I understand it this seems like a one-time opportunity. Assuming that the congregation is theologically untaught or misinformed I would not introduce theological terms that will not be comprehended or needlessly provoke the flock and have their minds tuning out the good Word of God.
O. okay. Wont the theolgical terms (as long as there is a explanation of these terms) be a good thing? To me, it just seems, that using these terms or encouraging believers to read theology is a great thing. We need a knowledge of God, and avoiding theology is one of the reasons our churches dont know God...
Joshua askedIf you were invited to guest preach at a non-Reformed church, what would you preach? How would you decide? And yes, I am asking because I have been asked to preach at a non-Reformed church, and no, I am not looking to cause trouble.
In a single sermon it is not to be expected that unfamiliar terms will be made clear to a congregation unfamiliar with strong meat.
2 Timothy 2:24 And a servant of the Lord must not quarrel but be gentle to all, able to teach, patient,
Since most non-Reformed churches today believe a false Gospel(one that does not include repentance) I would preach the historic, biblical doctrine of repentance for the remission of sins.
Since most non-Reformed churches today believe a false Gospel(one that does not include repentance) I would preach the historic, biblical doctrine of repentance for the remission of sins.
Just preach the Word. You don't need a special "I'm preaching in a non-Reformed church" message. Choose a text and preach it.
Since most non-Reformed churches today believe a false Gospel(one that does not include repentance) I would preach the historic, biblical doctrine of repentance for the remission of sins.
Andrew, I'm going to dispute your assertion that "most non-Reformed churches today believe a false Gospel." They may be incorrect inasmuch as Reformed soteriology goes, but I am not going to cast the "heretic" label on them. Beware of fulfilling the Reformed stereotype. To us does not belong all the known truth of scripture. Terms like Arminian are thrown around so casually that little to no thought is given to the ramifications of such labels.
Since most non-Reformed churches today believe a false Gospel(one that does not include repentance) I would preach the historic, biblical doctrine of repentance for the remission of sins.
Andrew, I'm going to dispute your assertion that "most non-Reformed churches today believe a false Gospel." They may be incorrect inasmuch as Reformed soteriology goes, but I am not going to cast the "heretic" label on them. Beware of fulfilling the Reformed stereotype. To us does not belong all the known truth of scripture. Terms like Arminian are thrown around so casually that little to no thought is given to the ramifications of such labels.
Since most non-Reformed churches today believe a false Gospel(one that does not include repentance) I would preach the historic, biblical doctrine of repentance for the remission of sins.
Andrew, I'm going to dispute your assertion that "most non-Reformed churches today believe a false Gospel." They may be incorrect inasmuch as Reformed soteriology goes, but I am not going to cast the "heretic" label on them. Beware of fulfilling the Reformed stereotype. To us does not belong all the known truth of scripture. Terms like Arminian are thrown around so casually that little to no thought is given to the ramifications of such labels.
Hmmm... I don't want to fulfill the Reformed stereotype. I've only encountered a small portion of the non-Reformed community in real life, that being the IFB community. But from poking around on a Baptist message board and listening to the popular non-Calvinist teachers and their idea of salvation, I don't know if I'm way off in saying that most non-Reformed don't preach the true Gospel(in the sense of preaching repentance and faith). But I've already changed so many of my views since being here on the PB, I admit I could be very wrong on this. Thanks for pointing that out.
Since most non-Reformed churches today believe a false Gospel(one that does not include repentance) I would preach the historic, biblical doctrine of repentance for the remission of sins.
Andrew, I'm going to dispute your assertion that "most non-Reformed churches today believe a false Gospel." They may be incorrect inasmuch as Reformed soteriology goes, but I am not going to cast the "heretic" label on them. Beware of fulfilling the Reformed stereotype. To us does not belong all the known truth of scripture. Terms like Arminian are thrown around so casually that little to no thought is given to the ramifications of such labels.
Hmmm... I don't want to fulfill the Reformed stereotype. I've only encountered a small portion of the non-Reformed community in real life, that being the IFB community. But from poking around on a Baptist message board and listening to the popular non-Calvinist teachers and their idea of salvation, I don't know if I'm way off in saying that most non-Reformed don't preach the true Gospel(in the sense of preaching repentance and faith). But I've already changed so many of my views since being here on the PB, I admit I could be very wrong on this. Thanks for pointing that out.
Preach on the Covenant of Works, the Covenant of Grace, and the Imputed Righteousness of Christ as our only hope.
To us does not belong all the known truth of scripture.
Not every non-Reformed church is teaching a false gospel. Piper's church isn't Reformed, nor is MacArthur's, and I wouldn't label them as preaching a false gospel.