Blessed Lord's Day, brothers. I have read John Calvin's Institutes on the sacraments, prompting me to more questions of clarification.
1. Dr. Calvin defines a sacrament as:
2. Given the above defenition, assuming we adopt it, would that make the speaking in other tounges in the early apostolic period another irregular sacrament? And thus pentacostal speaking in tounges a false sacrament?
3. Finally, it seems that John Calvin, in his own opinion, sees eye to eye with Augustine. Is his reading of Augustine a credible one?
1. Dr. Calvin defines a sacrament as:
and further, he says on the sacramental status of the laying on of hands:an external sign, by which the Lord seals on our consciences his promises of good-will toward us, in order to sustain the weakness of our faith, and we in our turn testify our piety towards him, both before himself and before angels as well as men (4.14.1)
So, is the laying on of hands a sort-of sacrament as Dr. Calvin contends?For the laying on of hands, by which the ministers of the Church are initiated into their office, though I have no objection to its being called a sacrament, I do not number among ordinary sacraments. (4.14.20)
2. Given the above defenition, assuming we adopt it, would that make the speaking in other tounges in the early apostolic period another irregular sacrament? And thus pentacostal speaking in tounges a false sacrament?
3. Finally, it seems that John Calvin, in his own opinion, sees eye to eye with Augustine. Is his reading of Augustine a credible one?