Craig.Scott
Puritan Board Freshman
Could someone please post the ordination vows of the RPCNA please?
In Christ
In Christ
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you have specifics?
What do you think the RPCNA teaches on exclusive psalmody and sabbath keeping that is off base from the WCF?
What do you think the RPCNA teaches on exclusive psalmody and sabbath keeping that is off base from the WCF?
What do you think the RPCNA teaches on exclusive psalmody and sabbath keeping that is off base from the WCF?
Apologies, it's not the teaching (I agree with it) but the subscription. I met elders who did not agree with EP and who broke the Sabbath.
How can one vow before God the WCF and do that? Apparently it's allowed to due exceptions, yet they vowed before God
Apologies, it's not the teaching (I agree with it) but the subscription. I met elders who did not agree with EP and who broke the Sabbath.
What do you think the RPCNA teaches on exclusive psalmody and sabbath keeping that is off base from the WCF?
Apologies, it's not the teaching (I agree with it) but the subscription. I met elders who did not agree with EP and who broke the Sabbath.
How can one vow before God the WCF and do that? Apparently it's allowed to due exceptions, yet they vowed before God
Is an elder in the RPCNA allowed to take exception to Sabbath keeping and Exclusive Psalmody? I wasn't aware that was the case, as even a member has to vow to uphold the 4th Commandment, and so it would be odd to me that an ordained man can take an exception to this.
I cannot disagree with Mr. Scott's assessment though, our confessionalism is, sadly, sometimes less than evangelicalism. Mr. Scott and I have talked face-to-face about these issues, and, of course, this problem is not in all sessions, but it is being fought in all presbyteries.
I cannot disagree with Mr. Scott's assessment though, our confessionalism is, sadly, sometimes less than evangelicalism. Mr. Scott and I have talked face-to-face about these issues, and, of course, this problem is not in all sessions, but it is being fought in all presbyteries.
Pastor,
What do you think would be some ways of solving this? More thorough examination of candidates? More detailed vows?
If the candidates are not living a life consistent with the vows, then it should be up to the sessions and presbytery to investigate this inconsistency. I would also hope that some observant members would raise the complaint. You can only vet a candidate so much. Like mom always said, proof is in the pudding. This is why we have church discipline.
If the candidates are not living a life consistent with the vows, then it should be up to the sessions and presbytery to investigate this inconsistency. I would also hope that some observant members would raise the complaint. You can only vet a candidate so much. Like mom always said, proof is in the pudding. This is why we have church discipline.
Agreed. I would also gently ask Mr. Scott to clarify his statements then on exceptions being made to the 4th Commandment and the Lord's Day if he has no proof that men are able to offer such exceptions and be ordained/installed in the RPCNA. I would also encourage Mr. Scott to continue to help the RPCNA by lovingly rebuking any elders in the RPCNA who are in fact dishonest about their subscription and their vows. And if they do not repent, then to bring the issue to the session or presbytery in question. Such actions would help speed the RPCNA along the trajectory that Pastor Eshelman has described in this thread.
Apparently it's allowed to due exceptions, yet they vowed before God