Casey
Puritan Board Junior
Why have confessional Reformed institutions (churches and schools) left our Christian heritage for Romanists, Eastern Orthodox, or liberals to translate and study? If I want to look for a pre-Reformation theological work in modern translation, almost inevitably it will be published by a Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, or liberal press. Why? Philip Schaff's work is good but, obviously, dated. Why isn't there a Reformed publisher or seminary that maintains an updated set of this important aspect of our history? I can anticipate a response: "there's no need since someone else has already done it," but I don't really like this argument. It's part of our intellectual and spiritual heritage, right? Case in point: SVS Press (warning: icons of the God-man). They publish all sorts of handy little paperbacks. We have the Puritan Paperbacks by the Banner of Truth, when will we get our Patristic Paperbacks? Or maybe we've already got something like this? I'm probably analyzing this situation wrong, but if we really think the Church didn't start in the 1500s, maybe we should publish that way.