CharlieJ
Puritan Board Junior
Note: This is a church history thread, not a theology thread. I'm interested in how the ancient and medieval church viewed the lot of the OT people of God.
This is from Theodore of Mopsuestia, in his Galatians commentary:
“That which was given through Moses was given with the express intention that those given the Law would live under it and, consequently, receive the righteousness which were settled in a far-off place, so that, separated from every other nation, they would be able to heed with due prudence the law given to them.
...
"The Law, of course, demanded obedience to all its regulations, keeping the people separated from others and so teaching them that no one ought ever to sin. The work of grace, by contrast, fulfills these demands by the resurrection and through immortality which will be ours through the Spirit, so that, governed by the Spirit, we shall not be able to commit any sin.
In any case, righteousness is both within the Law and in Christ, but under the Law one has to earn righteousness by much effort and hard work. This is very difficult; it is, let me assure you, almost impossible to observe scrupulously every requirement of the Law. Sinlessness is not possible in human life; in truth, it can only be obtained by grace. Just so, in the end, we shall sin no more only when we obtain the righteousness which comes from Christ, apart from anything we might be able to do."
On a positive note, the last statement seems like an affirmation of justification by faith. Other than that, I'm puzzled by this whole section. He seems to believe, not just that there was some kind of "works principle" revealed in the law, but that OT people actually had no recourse to salvation apart from fulfilling the law. Is that correct, and do other ancient theologians express similar ideas?
This is from Theodore of Mopsuestia, in his Galatians commentary:
“That which was given through Moses was given with the express intention that those given the Law would live under it and, consequently, receive the righteousness which were settled in a far-off place, so that, separated from every other nation, they would be able to heed with due prudence the law given to them.
...
"The Law, of course, demanded obedience to all its regulations, keeping the people separated from others and so teaching them that no one ought ever to sin. The work of grace, by contrast, fulfills these demands by the resurrection and through immortality which will be ours through the Spirit, so that, governed by the Spirit, we shall not be able to commit any sin.
In any case, righteousness is both within the Law and in Christ, but under the Law one has to earn righteousness by much effort and hard work. This is very difficult; it is, let me assure you, almost impossible to observe scrupulously every requirement of the Law. Sinlessness is not possible in human life; in truth, it can only be obtained by grace. Just so, in the end, we shall sin no more only when we obtain the righteousness which comes from Christ, apart from anything we might be able to do."
On a positive note, the last statement seems like an affirmation of justification by faith. Other than that, I'm puzzled by this whole section. He seems to believe, not just that there was some kind of "works principle" revealed in the law, but that OT people actually had no recourse to salvation apart from fulfilling the law. Is that correct, and do other ancient theologians express similar ideas?