Thomas, I couldn't help but notice your church is in Comstock, MI. I used to live in Climax, MI and served in a church near by. As to your question, much in the way of "tradition" got in the way of true Christianity, thus the Reformation. And while much was set right by the Reformation much was left as baggage carried over into worship (especially in the eyes of those who have remained "baptisitic"). Could it be that this "high" view of Mary, though pious it may be, to be a part of the "baggage" carried over? When ever Jesus is ridiculed by the unbelieving crowds as to his divinity, it seems they enjoyed bringing up his family relationships to disclaim the things he confessed. What would be the point of bringing up mention of his cousins in relation to Mary in a situation like Matthew 12:55-56? It is also interesting that in the Greek different words are used when identifying relationships. For instance, in Luke 1:36, 58 the word "soo-ghen-ace" is used to refer to the relationship between Mary and Elizabeth (which the KJV translates as "cousin"). However, in Matthew 12:55-56, more intimate words are used to describe these relationships with Jesus, "may-tare" = Mother, "ad-el-foy" = brothers (pl.), and "ad-el-fay" (pl., feminine) = sisters. I haven't been able to think of any presently, but what undisputed examples do we have in scripture where such intimate words are used to describe general relationships. This could help vindicate the position of "cousins" over "siblings". As it stands, I fail to see how the "perpetual virginity" doctrine is attainable by the Scripture and how it makes Mary more pious even IF she took this upon herself. I am open to hearing the argument for this position. Thanks!