RamistThomist
Puritanboard Clerk
I know that WTJ did a piece on this. What year was it?
Frame/Wells/Mueller correspondence?
- Thread starter RamistThomist
- Start date
- Status
crhoades
Puritan Board Graduate
Fruitful interchange to read.
In order of appearance:
Muller on Theology - John Frame
WTJ 56:1 (Spring 1994)
The Study of Theology Revisited: A Response to John Frame - Richard A. Muller
WTJ 56:2 (Fall 1994)
In Defense of Something Close to Biblicism: Reflections On Sola Scriptura and History in Theological Method - John Frame
WTJ 59:2 (Fall 97)
On Being Framed - David F. Wells
WTJ 59:2 (Fall 97)
Reply to Richard Muller and David Wells - John Frame
WTJ 59:2 (Fall 97)
In order of appearance:
Muller on Theology - John Frame
WTJ 56:1 (Spring 1994)
The Study of Theology Revisited: A Response to John Frame - Richard A. Muller
WTJ 56:2 (Fall 1994)
In Defense of Something Close to Biblicism: Reflections On Sola Scriptura and History in Theological Method - John Frame
WTJ 59:2 (Fall 97)
On Being Framed - David F. Wells
WTJ 59:2 (Fall 97)
Reply to Richard Muller and David Wells - John Frame
WTJ 59:2 (Fall 97)
I doubt one can understand the discussion until they have grasped John Frame's "theology-as-application" model, which he spends some time developing in Doctrine of the Knowledge of God. Richard Muller and David Wells approach theology according to the old model, as a science. Hence their view of history and historical theology allows for normativity, whereas Frame's approach can consider a truth as valid in one age but a redundancy in another.
RamistThomist
Puritanboard Clerk
I have read most of what Frame has written and much of what Wells has written (and thoroughly enjoyed both!). Mueller is in the mail at the moment.
- Status