sotzo
Puritan Board Sophomore
When congregations split, it often furthers the divide between believers of that church and, ultimately, the Church universal...it tears at the unity to which Scripture calls us.
Is there any indication that the Reformers were grieved about what their actions could do to the Church's unity? Clearly reforms were needed (as even the RCC acknowledges) and indulgences, etc were gnawing away at unity anyway. To not reform would have been irresponsible and an ignoring of the clear teaching of Scripture. But, is there any indication that they were saddened by what was the biggest split in Church history?
All I've been able to glean from is Bainton's work on Luther, but it really only highlights his courage in the face of the Roman leaders of the day. Any other refs on this you may have would be much appreciated.
Is there any indication that the Reformers were grieved about what their actions could do to the Church's unity? Clearly reforms were needed (as even the RCC acknowledges) and indulgences, etc were gnawing away at unity anyway. To not reform would have been irresponsible and an ignoring of the clear teaching of Scripture. But, is there any indication that they were saddened by what was the biggest split in Church history?
All I've been able to glean from is Bainton's work on Luther, but it really only highlights his courage in the face of the Roman leaders of the day. Any other refs on this you may have would be much appreciated.