Deleting banned members

[Poimen]

I think we need to delete the names of banned members. That way we could all move up in our ranks on the member list.



But maybe you leave them on so that we have reason to fear that the same might happen to us?

 

[Scott Bushey]

Uhhhh no!!

 

[Poimen]

Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Uhhhh no!!

Huh? Why not?!

[Edited on 8-25-2005 by poimen]

 

[RamistThomist]

I think that if we delete banned members posts (is that what you are getting at?), then some of the conversations won't make sense. That and it sounds very Orwellian!

 

[Poimen]

Originally posted by joshua
We can't tell you or we'd have to kil..err...ban you.

Um... ok.

 

[Poimen]

Originally posted by Draught Horse
I think that if we delete banned members posts (is that what you are getting at?), then some of the conversations won't make sense. That and it sounds very Orwellian!

No I don't want them to delete the posts, just the names from the member list.

 

[Abd_Yesua_alMasih]

Wouldn't the two go together?

 

[gwine]

I thought I was reading 1984 again.

Seriously, why would you want to delete banned "members?"

 

[RamistThomist]

Originally posted by gwine
I thought I was reading 1984 again.

Seriously, why would you want to delete banned "members?"

To erase memory of their very existence!
Muwhahahaha

 

[gwine]

Originally posted by Draught Horse

Originally posted by gwine
I thought I was reading 1984 again.

Seriously, why would you want to delete banned "members?"

To erase memory of their very existence!
Muwhahahaha

That must be why we don't talk about old what's his name anymore.

 

[Poimen]

Originally posted by gwine
I thought I was reading 1984 again.

Seriously, why would you want to delete banned "members?"

?

See the first post:

"That way we could all move up in our ranks on the member list."

 

[alwaysreforming]

Brother Daniel,

Don't you know that "the last shall be first, and the first last?"

 

[PuritanCovenanter]

Originally posted by alwaysreforming
Brother Daniel,

Don't you know that "the last shall be first, and the first last?"

Bummer, I wanted to sit near Andrew.

 

[SolaScriptura]

I think that we should begin referring to banned members as "the one who must never be named." That would be cool.

 

[just_grace]

Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Uhhhh no!!

70 times 7

[Edited on 8-26-2005 by just_grace]

 

[gwine]

Originally posted by poimen

Originally posted by gwine
I thought I was reading 1984 again.

Seriously, why would you want to delete banned "members?"

?

See the first post:

"That way we could all move up in our ranks on the member list."

But I like the number 981.

 

[turmeric]

Originally posted by SolaScriptura
I think that we should begin referring to banned members as "the one who must never be named." That would be cool.

Those of whom we do not speak...it's so Village
We could change the color of their names in the list to (whispering) the bad color!

 

[Scott Bushey]

Originally posted by just_grace

Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Uhhhh no!!

70 times 7

[Edited on 8-26-2005 by just_grace]

I never said I didn't forgive them. We hate banning people; in fact, we do not ban many. Probably less than a dozen since inception. This saddens me. Those whom have been removed were pretty bad.

[Edited on 8-26-2005 by Scott Bushey]

 

[Pilgrim]

Originally posted by Draught Horse
I think that if we delete banned members posts (is that what you are getting at?), then some of the conversations won't make sense. That and it sounds very Orwellian!

Yeah, kind of like when Stalin would remove individuals who had been purged from official photographs.