Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you sure this thread doesn't belong under Computers and Technology forum as an example of how not to design a web site?
Who runs the site?
Oh, Be careful little eyes what you see!
Interesting resource with historical quotations, etc.
Cheers,
It is pretty ugly.
It is pretty ugly.
It's reassuring to know that we all have such important priorities!
That's right; all establishment needs is another ugly site promoting it. And anonymously on top of that.
It is pretty ugly.
It's reassuring to know that we all have such important priorities!
On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism
Is it still the longest word in the dictionary?
On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism
Is it still the longest word in the dictionary?
I was hoping to see some comments that didn't have to do with the graphics of the site...
So what is a good working definition of establishmentarianism?
Civil magistrates may not assume to themselves the administration of the Word and sacraments; or the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven; yet he has authority, and it is his duty, to take order that unity and peace be preserved in the Church, that the truth of God be kept pure and entire, that all blasphemies and heresies be suppressed, all corruptions and abuses in worship and discipline prevented or reformed, and all the ordainances of God duly settled, administrated, and observed. For the better effecting whereof, he has power to call synods, to be present at them and to provide that whatsoever is transacted in them be according to the mind of God.
The original WCF is establishmentarian while the American revisions strip out those portions. I know Rev. Winzer faithfully represents the establishmentarian view on the PB.
I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy.
I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy.
I believe Rev. Winzer is right.
However, the same agument about the difficulty of such an arrangement would have seemed very real to the Christians in the late 200s, early 300s, and yet they were emancipated not long thereafter, with Nicea being called within a quarter of a century.
It reminds me of something I read recently about many of the presbyters at Nicea having mutilated faces, ears, etc. from the persecution throughout their lifetime, to then command kings and empires.
Cheers,
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
How could a civil magistrate be a nursing father in a church? What role would you want your senator to play in your congregation? How would you safeguard poor dissenting baptists?
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original.
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original.
How could a civil magistrate be a nursing father in a church? What role would you want your senator to play in your congregation? How would you safeguard poor dissenting baptists?
A magistrate may safeguard poor dissenting baptists by helping them see the error of their ways
Cheers,
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
What methods would he employ?
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
It depends in what point of the spectrum one stands.
-----Added 6/30/2009 at 05:56:14 EST-----
What methods would he employ?
Synods, councils, instruction, warning, rebuke; that would be a good start.
Were you hoping I'd go Zwinglian on you?
Cheers,
By the way, sensing the unpopularity and steam of that other word "theonomy," is your use of the term establishmentarianism a new trend for the same platform?