Christian Establishmentarianism Throughout the Ages

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you sure this thread doesn't belong under Computers and Technology forum as an example of how not to design a web site?
 
I was hoping to see some comments that didn't have to do with the graphics of the site...:)

So what is a good working definition of establishmentarianism?
 
On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism

Is it still the longest word in the dictionary?
 
That's right; all establishment needs is another ugly site promoting it. And anonymously on top of that.
It is pretty ugly.

It's reassuring to know that we all have such important priorities! :lol:

Glad you got my joke.

Cheers,

-----Added 6/30/2009 at 03:17:45 EST-----

On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism

Is it still the longest word in the dictionary?

:lol:

In the English dictionary.
 
On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism

Is it still the longest word in the dictionary?

I think so...

but here's what was once regarded as the longest place name in the word... would love to hear Derek Thomas pronounce it :)

gales.jpg

11580362.JPG
 
I was hoping to see some comments that didn't have to do with the graphics of the site...:)

So what is a good working definition of establishmentarianism?


This might be a good starting point:

Civil magistrates may not assume to themselves the administration of the Word and sacraments; or the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven; yet he has authority, and it is his duty, to take order that unity and peace be preserved in the Church, that the truth of God be kept pure and entire, that all blasphemies and heresies be suppressed, all corruptions and abuses in worship and discipline prevented or reformed, and all the ordainances of God duly settled, administrated, and observed. For the better effecting whereof, he has power to call synods, to be present at them and to provide that whatsoever is transacted in them be according to the mind of God.

Cheers,
 
The original WCF is establishmentarian while the American revisions strip out those portions. I know Rev. Winzer faithfully represents the establishmentarian view on the PB.
 
Thanks, Adam and Rich. Turns out I already knew what it was (and affirmed it) without linking the concept to its specific name. :p
 
The original WCF is establishmentarian while the American revisions strip out those portions. I know Rev. Winzer faithfully represents the establishmentarian view on the PB.

It could be argued, however, that the revision merely represents a non-denominational establishment. I agree that it does preclude the original version of the establishment, and that the trajectory was toward what we see in the modern world. But, for a magistrate to be called a "nursing father" to the church, and still be required (in the catechetical explanations) to support and maintain the church is a mild form of establishmentarianism which every office bearer in revised WCF churches agrees to (barring, of course, exceptions).

Cheers,
 
I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy.
 
I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy.

I believe Rev. Winzer is right.

However, the same agument about the difficulty of such an arrangement would have seemed very real to the Christians in the late 200s, early 300s, and yet they were emancipated not long thereafter, with Nicea being called within a quarter of a century.

It reminds me of something I read recently about many of the presbyters at Nicea having mutilated faces, ears, etc. from the persecution throughout their lifetime, to then command kings and empires.

Cheers,
 
How could a civil magistrate be a nursing father in a church? What role would you want your senator to play in your congregation? How would you safeguard poor dissenting baptists?
 
I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy.

I believe Rev. Winzer is right.

However, the same agument about the difficulty of such an arrangement would have seemed very real to the Christians in the late 200s, early 300s, and yet they were emancipated not long thereafter, with Nicea being called within a quarter of a century.

It reminds me of something I read recently about many of the presbyters at Nicea having mutilated faces, ears, etc. from the persecution throughout their lifetime, to then command kings and empires.

Cheers,



True enough. Historically there are some questions about Constantine's motivations in calling the Council but I believe the Lord used the Providence, whatever his personal motivations, for the good of the Church. Not all was good out of that involvement as he introduced the idea of vestments into the Church as well but I don't want to get off track.

I think the interesting discussion is how a government such as ours could deal with heresy or if it requires a radical Reformation. Part of me wouldn't mind seeing the government protecting people from heresy but they don't really have the tools necessary to detect it given our culture's captivity to non-Christian philosophies.

I'm not against the notion of Establishmentarianism in principle but am weary of certain types.
 
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?

I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original.
 
How could a civil magistrate be a nursing father in a church? What role would you want your senator to play in your congregation? How would you safeguard poor dissenting baptists?

Pergamum,

The prophet's description is concerning the Messianic age being a time when the kings will be like nursing fathers to God's children. To see what a nursing father is like would not require much more than reading 1 & 2 Samuel, and 1 & 2 Kings, concerning the "good things" that were done by kings.

What role would I want the senator to play in my congregation? I suppose that would depend on what my congregation was doing, teaching, promoting, etc.

A magistrate may safeguard poor dissenting baptists by helping them see the error of their ways ;)

Cheers,
 
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?

I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original.

So you would favor a 3rd revision on this point? Maybe something in between the original and the 1788 revisions?
 
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?

I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original.

I think the same could be stated concerning Romans 13. The principal that the magistrate is God's servant, and to administer His vengence is universally applicable, regardless of the personal or official status of a given magistrate. Just as the rules don't change for faithless husbands; the rules are the same. The church's task is to warn the adulterer, as well as the adulterous magistrate.

Cheers,
 
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?

It depends in what point of the spectrum one stands.

-----Added 6/30/2009 at 05:56:14 EST-----

What methods would he employ?

Synods, councils, instruction, warning, rebuke; that would be a good start.

Were you hoping I'd go Zwinglian on you? ;)

Cheers,

"a good start"? GULP. :eek::eek::eek:

If you start there, where will you end?





By the way, sensing the unpopularity and steam of that other word "theonomy," is your use of the term establishmentarianism a new trend for the same platform?
 
By the way, sensing the unpopularity and steam of that other word "theonomy," is your use of the term establishmentarianism a new trend for the same platform?

I spell God with a capital "g" ;)

Did you read the cite I sent? I introduced a thread on establishmentarianism throughout the centuries. I don't care if Theonomy is an unpopular term.

Cheers,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top