I've saw a few articles online which claim baptists are not protestants.
Seems like a strange thought to me.
Why Baptist are not Protestants
Seems like a strange thought to me.
Why Baptist are not Protestants
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've saw a few articles online which claim baptists are not protestants.
Seems like a strange thought to me.
Why Baptist are not Protestants
I've saw a few articles online which claim baptists are not protestants.
Seems like a strange thought to me.
Why Baptist are not Protestants
The article you linked seems to support the Anabaptist movement. I'd agree that the Anabaptists are not Protestants.
I've saw a few articles online which claim baptists are not protestants.
Seems like a strange thought to me.
Why Baptist are not Protestants
The article you linked seems to support the Anabaptist movement. I'd agree that the Anabaptists are not Protestants.
So, the assumption being that baptists are the offspring of anabaptists and therefore also not protestants?
I've saw a few articles online which claim baptists are not protestants.
Seems like a strange thought to me.
Why Baptist are not Protestants
The article you linked seems to support the Anabaptist movement. I'd agree that the Anabaptists are not Protestants.
So, the assumption being that baptists are the offspring of anabaptists and therefore also not protestants?
The article you linked seems to support the Anabaptist movement. I'd agree that the Anabaptists are not Protestants.
So, the assumption being that baptists are the offspring of anabaptists and therefore also not protestants?
Baptists are not the "offspring" of Anabaptists. Do a comparison study of Calvinistic Baptist and Anabaptist theology.
The First Known Baptist Congregations (?)
The first known Baptist Congregation was formed by a number of these fleeing separatists in Amsterdam, Holland in 1608. It was largely made up of British persons led by John Smyth who along with Thomas Helwys, sought to set up the group according to New Testament patterns. As they saw it, it was important to 'reconstitute' and not just 'reform' the Church. There was emphasis placed on personal conversion and on baptism, which was to be given to individuals who had personally professed faith in Jesus Christ, that is, to believers only and on mutual covenanting between and among believers. Though taking some years to crystallize, the reconstituting efforts of Smyth, Helwys and others gave distinctive shape not only to the group's belief and practice, but the various others which emerged from it. Some affiliated groups started when members of the Amsterdam group went back to Britain and took the name 'Baptist' to identify themselves. This had to do with the distinctive approach to the meaning and mode of baptism.
With the continuing religious and civil disturbances, and with the new awareness in Europe of North America, many persons, including those influenced by Baptists and related beliefs, practices and groups, crossed the Atlantic to build a 'New World'. They sought not only to establish dwellings, but their faith as well. In time the entire continent, but particularly the Eastern section, was affected, Baptist Churches, being among the many institutions, which sprang up in the seventeenth century. All these shaped not only the new American Environment, but eventually impacted beyond it as well.
William Cathcart, Baptist Historian/Author
The American Baptists deny that they owe their origin to Roger Williams. The English Baptists will not grant that John Smyth or Thomas Helwysse was their founder. The Welsh Baptists strenuously contend that they received their creed in the first century, from those who obtained it, direct, from the apostles themselves. The Dutch Baptists trace their spiritual pedigree up to the same source. German Baptists maintained that they were older than the reformation, older than the corrupt hierarchy which it sought to reform. The Waldensian Baptists boasted an ancestry far older than Waldo, older than the most ancient of their predecessors in the Vales of Piedmont. All these maintain that it ultimately reappears, and reveals their source in Christ and His apostles." (pp. 34-35 - The Testimony of the Baptists, by Curtis A. Pugh quoting William Cathcart, the Baptist Encyclopedia, 1881, pp. 620-621.)
Baptists are Protestant in the sense of the 4 solas but not Protestant when used politically.
Baptists are Protestant in the sense of the 4 solas but not Protestant when used politically.
The question that needs to be answer is, "What do Baptists believe?"
I knew many converted RCs who embraced the Reformed faith yet would never in a million years think of themsleves as Protestant.
Hudson’s famous five points of Baptist/Anabaptist discontinuity have provided the
principal frame of reference for debate:
a. Early Baptists themselves repeatedly denied they were Anabaptists.
b. Baptists firmly rejected the distinctive features of Anabaptist life.
c. Practically all of the early Baptist leaders had been Separatists before they adopted
Baptist views.
d. Baptist views represent the logical conclusions of Separatism.
e. After John Smyth’s defection to the Anabaptists, he was repudiated by a Baptist
remnant who separated from him.
I would see three lines of baptist ancestry. Those who would trace the line back to the Anabaptists would say Baptists were not Protestant. Believing in the separation of church and state (infant baptism being perceived as baptism in the state church, RC or Protestant) Anabaptists were persecuted by both RCs and Prots.
Those who would trace Baptist lineage through pre-reformation groups would not see Baptists as Protestant either as they pre-date the Reformation.
Those who link back to the English Separatists are more likely to think in terms of Baptists as Protestant.
It is a long story and I would not wish to divert the thread away from the original question, but it is not fair to say those who love the reformed faith and bravely proclaim it to their RC families and neighbours haven't understood what it means to be reformed.
They do understand what it means to be reformed, its the hi-jacking of Protestantism with all its abuses they cannot get their heads around.
Maybe it is a definitional thing. But, if you add up the members of credobaptist churches known in dictionaries as "Protestant" and compare it with the number of those in paedobaptist communions, my guess is that the credobaptist "Protestants" outnumber the paedos by a significant number.