Anselm of Canterbury

Status
Not open for further replies.

Reformed Covenanter

Cancelled Commissioner
I have been reading some of the Major Works of Anselm of Canterbury over the last few days (OUP edition). In your opinion, what are the strengths and weaknesses of his theology?
 
If I remember correctly he was very influencial in defining the substitutionary view of atonement as opposed to the ransom theory.
 
Strengths: strong doctrine of God in Proslogion and Monologion. Attempts a good discussion of the Filioque. Moves the discussion forward on penal substitution.

Weaknesses: Some Marian theology; his Ontological argument only works if you presuppose his brand of philosophical realism.
 
In your opinion, what are the strengths and weaknesses of his theology?

From a reformed viewpoint we meet with a dangerous contradiction. His strength is his ontological presupposition of God and reasoning from faith (God alone is necessary being). In direct contrast his weakness is his use of reasoning apart from Scripture to show the "necessity" of certain points related to saving truths. Iron and clay -- they don't bond and they eventually fall apart when pressed.
 
I have been reading some of the Major Works of Anselm of Canterbury over the last few days (OUP edition). In your opinion, what are the strengths and weaknesses of his theology?

It is absurd that he and Bozo judge of what God must do based on what seems fitting to them. But his argument against the Greeks is very stimulating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top