reformed dogmatics

As promised in our thread on Vos, the following are my thoughts on why Vos's Reformed Dogmatics is just ok: Firstly, the good: Vos is generally, although not universally, in line with the Reformed Confessions, and he isn't a liberal (i.e. he believes in the inspiration and authority of...

Dr. Lane Tipton, Fellow of Biblical and Systematic Theology at Reformed Forum, has just released a new article through the Reformed Forum newsletter. In it, he challenges Dr. John Fesko's introductory essay to Geerhardus Vos' Natural Theology, which Reformation Heritage recently released. Dr...

There are one or two very old threads (the latest one being about twelve years old) about G. H. Kersten. I just recently purchased his Reformed Dogmatics from RHB. I have read some of it, and have enjoyed it for its readability, understandability, and concision. He isn't as thorough as Berkhof...

In Reformed Dogmatics, Bavinck contends for the use of the word principium for Scripture rather than the use of fons, as the latter mistakenly pictures Scripture as a well from which to draw doctrine mechanically, which the editor claims to be Charles Hodge’s view (this is the abridged...

As unabashedly wonderful, profitable and edifying as the English translation of Bavinck's Reformed Dogmatics has been, there has been one aspect of it that seems less than helpful to a person who (like myself) would like to frequently cite Bavinck in response to questions on religious discussion...